While I always pictured Robin Hood as a cartoon fox in a jaunty green number, he is, apparently, a 47-year old Senator of Kenyan/Caucasian birth sporting everything but a flag pin. I had no idea.
But perhaps you’d say that Robin Hood was a good guy. Someone you’d like to vote for. He helped the poor and stuck it to that evil King Richard and made everything better for the whole land. And maybe this was a legitimate cause under a stagnant English monarchy wherein the poor were truly unable to thrive. But this is America, and that’s just not the way we do things.
A friend of mine told me about one of her coworkers, a guy who is fully aware of Obama’s socialist tendencies but doesn’t seem to mind. “What’s wrong with that?” he asked my conservative compadre, baffled that her opposition to socialism was her main argument against Barack. I guess on the surface, a socialist nation doesn’t look so bad. Everyone has the same amount of money so no one feels inferior or is destitute, and all the people start and stay on the same class level. It’s like a private school with uniforms: if we all look the same, no one will be jealous or distracted or slutty.
I went to a private school one year. I hated those plaid skirts and cardigans more than anything in my life.
Barack Obama’s agenda to “spread the wealth around” is frightening. What’s more frightening is how he thinks it’s N.B.D. He’s been talking about a socialized economy (and socialized health care, but I’ll rip on that some other day) since this whole thing started, and people have been going right along with it. The way Obama explains his system, with his taxation of big corporations and tax credits to middle and lower class families, sounds just like President Robin Hood, only in Obama’s case it’s the rich stealing from the rich and giving to the less rich (because let’s face it, America, no one here is truly impoverished by international standards).
I know the story has been harped on endlessly since the last debate, but I feel it’s relevant here, so here’s my comparison using Joe the Plummer:
Obama’s new tax policies would discourage success. Joe wants to better himself by buying a company, something he has worked very hard to be able to do, but once he does so, he’ll be taxed into the poor house and have to close his brand new business. And Obama’s claim that only a “small percentage” of small businesses will be affected by his tax reform is crap; the average small business is making $3.6 million per year, and Obama’s plan would tax them almost $230,000 per year more than they’re paying now. I don’t know about you or your small business, but I say 230k is a decent chunk of change, one I’d rather not see spread into a socialist system that provides cash for the undeserving.
Allow me to make my last statement clear: NOT EVERYONE DESERVES GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE. There are some people in America who do absolutely nothing for themselves. Spoiled brat princess girls, drug addicts who make no attempt to quit, the just plain lazy. I will not pad their pockets, understand? I work hard for the money I earn, and if I continue to work hard and someday become wealthy, I should not be penalized for it, and those who have not worked hard should not be rewarded for it. America is a land of opportunity. The American Dream is achieving enormous success from humble beginnings, and when we begin to cut down those who make it to the top, people will stop aiming for it. Why should Joe the Plummer be motivated to buy the company he wants when it’s a guaranteed tax hike? He might as well stay where he is because it’s less stress, less responsibility, and essentially more pay.
So if no one is willing to take on the stress and responsibility and voluntary pay cuts, who’s going to lead us? Who’s going to shoot for the stars and start the small businesses and further our economy and participate in capitalism and stimulate ingenuity? When Obama’s in charge? No one.
Funny how a man who is running under a guise of hope is proposing legislation that quashes optimism. Enjoy turning into Cuba, people. I’ll be the one saying I told you so.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Vote Robin Hood '08!
Labels:
barack obama,
campaign 2008,
democracy,
democrat,
election,
joe biden,
john mccain,
politics,
republican,
sarah palin,
socialism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

8 comments:
Another anomaly in this election: isn't the Left who have railed against right-wing Christians all these years and now they are, in essence, voting for a theocracy in the form of Messiahbama? Just a thought...
Oh dear kids, we're quite the fiesty ones.
Capitalism may not be such a thing of the past but again. Look at it this way even as unconvincing as it may sound.
We've been hollering for a socialist economy for years. while we still are the home of the free and the brave we want something different. Fine if it goes all to hell be my guest to tell me you told me so. It's not a problem for me, because i've been doing the same thing to repeat bush voters for four years.
As for your money, we're not handing it over to hillbilly rednecks and drug users sitting on their couches watching their new fangled MTV. we're giving it to organizations that need it. we're funding schools with it, we're helping under privileged, we're helping the disabled, we're expanding our dream into one big dream where we work together. One big socialist family. So shoot me.
No offense, but the way things have been going lately, i'd rather turn into cold war russia at this point. Thats how ready for change I am.
As for Messiahbama, jackiemae. It's better than waiting for a white haired war veteran to kick it and let palin toting her rifle and shooting congress into alaskan shape.
But thats just this side of the bandwagon kids. afterall, being an obama supporter i must just be in it for the trends right?
Kelly, love you girl- keeping pumping out that hard hitting writing. I'll read every word of it and never knock you for what you believe in. I'll just throw in my two cents just like you have.
You're fully entitled to your two cents, and thank you for granting me the same. We definitely disagree, but that's ok. I'm ready for change, too, but NOT to socialism. We need economic reform, yes, but not a full-fledged transformation from capitalism and free trade to spreading the wealth around.
Dear BWBitch,
I don't know how I got dragged into your vitriol, but let me take an opportunity to respond. I am not the one injecting religion into this campaign, just as it is not Republicans injecting race into this race. When you say that calling Obama the messiah (I lower case the word out of respect for the real Messiah) is a joke, well, the joke is on you. Look at Louis Farrakhan's speech where says just that. When we say that Obama has reached messiah status, it is because he has achieved--somehow--deification in the eyes of his followers. It is no longer a matter of you all looking to him as the best candidate but of you looking to him as your savior; he's going to save not only the US but the world. And that is precisely what is wrong with his outrageous Socialist claims--he wants you to look to him and his government to solve all your problems instead of you solving your own. This starry-eyed devotion to him is frightening. Your screen name says it all--you have joined those people who have chosen to blindly follow a dangerous leader, thinking he will solve all your problems when in fact he will be all our downfall.
Sorry, Kelly for being so negative when you want to take your blog in a more positive direction. But at this point, I feel I have to be the siren sounding the warning. Wake up people! You're being hoodwinked.
Mommasita
jackiemae,
after stewing all day about your comment i have decided to take the route of not going a-wall on you. Because attacks have done nothing good for this campaign. But let me just clarify a few things to justify my belief in Mr. Barak Obama.
You said in your last comment that you were not the one "dragging religion into this campaign". But, let us refer to your comment that you made previously in Kellys fine blog named "Get the Fog Outta here", and I quote YOU said "should cause every sincere Christian to seriously rethink voting for this man". By using the term Christian, you are singling out the Christian community and dragging people of certain beliefs to reconsider electing a man as president because some "trendy" kids decided to name him as their Messiah.
I agree with you when saying that This Messiah thing has gone waaay to far. No one should refer to someone on that level out of meer respect for the actual Messiah.
But, as you have noticed from my political banter, you can't change minds so easily when you're on the opposing side.
While I, and many other Obama supporters, do believe that referring to him as some sort of God-like figure is way out of line, again, its just a trend and joke and honestly McCain's campaign is looking for anything right about now to discredit Obama.
I agree with McCain on many levels of his political campaign, however, I just happen to agree with Obama more. Sorry. But I will never attack anyone for their belief in a candidate just as long as they are voting for the right reason and with good understanding behind it, just like Kelly.
As for my name "BandWagon Bitch" Jackiemae, that just solidifies that you can't determine sarcasm on the internet, which most of us can't. But it is simply, again, a joke. My reasoning for this name: McCain supporters tag every Obama supporter as "jumping on the bandwagon" and being in on the trend. You can't just agree with Obama anymore, because apparently everyone who agrees with him is only doing it for the killer fashion this season. So Im playing into the game, just like Kelly isnt giving up hope on John McCain just yet.
I will say it again, my name is a joke, a play on the trend of this time. It is not serious. But I'll type it again as my screen name anyway.
Jackiemae, politics make people rude and Im sorry if I offended you in any way, I just want you to vote for who ever you want to for you..Not anyone else. And for good reason, not just because your religious beliefs agree with it. Again, Im sorry if I hurt you or offended you, it was completely unintentional, but we are playing the crafty game of political debate here.
Kelly, if you don't know who I am by now then you're not the twin I thought you were. :)
Of course I knew it was you, silly.
Regardless of the previous comments here, I would like to share a few lines from the movie Enemy at the Gates...a WW2 Russian Sniper movie.
"Man will always be man.
There is no new man.
We tried so hard to create
a society that was equal,
where there'd be nothing
to envy your neighbor.
But there's always
something to envy.
A smile...
a friendship.
Something you don't have
and want to appropriate.
In this world-
even a Soviet one-
there will always
be rich and poor.
Rich in gifts...
poor in gifts.
Rich in love...
poor in love."
This line, said before this character commits suicide by German Sniper, always stood out to me. The idea of "sharing the wealth" or "making it all equal" goes against what MAN truely is. We are born to accomplish more, to gain more, to win, to strive for more. Is it more civilized to go against your nature or to utilize your strengths to accomplish more? Is it actually better to force man into a situtation where equality is the goal but suicide is the outcome?
...oh yeah, one other thing. You're welcome for the small business statistics. :) If you wanna post my full economic breakdown, you can. Just give me credit. LOL
Post a Comment